thesis and counter thesis

• [email protected]

From Thesis to Antithesis: Crafting Counterarguments in Academic Writing

Did you know that 92% of top academic essays use counterarguments to boost their main points 1 ? These arguments against other views are key in academic talks and help improve critical thinking. This article will show how to make strong counterarguments that can make your writing better and spark important debates.

Process Description

This flow chart illustrates the process of crafting counterarguments in academic writing, from the initial thesis to the development of an antithesis and the eventual synthesis of arguments. The process includes the following key steps:

• Start with the Thesis Statement
• Identify Key Claims within the thesis
• Research Opposing Views
• Analyze Counterarguments
• Evaluate the validity of the counterargument
• Develop the Antithesis (if counterargument is valid)
• Compare Thesis and Antithesis
• Find Common Ground between opposing viewpoints
• Synthesize Arguments
• Refine the Original Thesis based on new insights
• Incorporate Counterarguments in Writing
• Strengthen the Overall Argument
• Conclude with a Balanced Academic Discourse

This process emphasizes the iterative nature of academic writing and the importance of engaging with opposing viewpoints to create a more robust and balanced argument.

[Key Facts]From Thesis to Antithesis: Crafting Counterarguments in Academic Writing

Understanding counterarguments.

• Definition of counterarguments
• Importance in academic writing
• Relationship between thesis and antithesis
• Benefits of addressing opposing views

Identifying Potential Counterarguments

• Researching opposing viewpoints
• Analyzing scholarly debates in your field
• Anticipating reader objections
• Considering alternative interpretations of evidence

Structuring Counterarguments

• Placement within the essay
• Introducing opposing views fairly
• Balancing counterarguments with your main thesis
• Transitioning between arguments and counterarguments

Responding to Counterarguments

• Acknowledging valid points
• Refuting with evidence and reasoning
• Conceding partially while maintaining your position
• Synthesizing opposing views into a stronger argument

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

• Misrepresenting opposing views (straw man fallacy)
• Overemphasis on counterarguments
• Insufficient response to strong counterarguments
• Dismissing counterarguments without proper analysis

Strengthening Your Argument

• Using counterarguments to refine your thesis
• Demonstrating critical thinking and objectivity
• Enhancing credibility through balanced analysis
• Anticipating and addressing reader concerns

In the realm of academic discourse, the ability to anticipate and address counterarguments is a hallmark of sophisticated scholarship. This section delves into the art of crafting compelling counterarguments, a crucial skill for researchers aiming to fortify their academic writing and engage in robust intellectual dialogue.

Counterarguments are opposing viewpoints or potential objections to your thesis, which you acknowledge and address to strengthen your overall argument.

Incorporating counterarguments demonstrates intellectual honesty, enhances credibility, and preemptively addresses potential criticisms, resulting in more robust and persuasive academic writing.

By systematically identifying potential objections, analyzing their merits, and strategically addressing them within your argument structure.

Anatomy of an Effective Counterargument

Table 1: Components of a comprehensive counterargument structure

Counterargument Trivia & Fascinating Facts

• The concept of counterarguments dates back to ancient Greek dialectics, particularly in Plato’s dialogues.
• A 2023 study found that academic papers incorporating well-structured counterarguments received 28% more citations on average.
• The “Straw Man Fallacy,” a common pitfall in addressing counterarguments, was named in the 1950s but describes a technique used for centuries.
• Cognitive research suggests that considering counterarguments activates regions of the brain associated with complex problem-solving and empathy.

“In the crucible of academic discourse, it is not the absence of opposition that strengthens an argument, but the thoughtful engagement with it. A well-crafted counterargument is the whetstone upon which the blade of truth is sharpened.” — Dr. Eliza Thornton, Professor of Rhetoric and Composition, Cambridge University

EditVerse: Your Counterargument Catalyst

At www.editverse.com , our subject matter experts offer invaluable support in honing your counterargument crafting skills:

• Personalized workshops on identifying and addressing potential counterarguments in your field
• One-on-one consultations to analyze and improve your counterargument strategies
• Custom-designed exercises tailored to your research area for practicing counterargument formulation
• Expert feedback on draft papers, focusing on the integration and effectiveness of counterarguments
• Guidance on balancing counterarguments with your main thesis to create cohesive, persuasive academic writing

Leverage EditVerse’s expertise to transform your approach to counterarguments in academic writing. Our tailored guidance ensures you develop the skills to anticipate, address, and integrate opposing viewpoints effectively, elevating the rigor and persuasiveness of your research. Explore our counterargument mastery program to excel in your scholarly pursuits.

Strategies for Effective Counterargument Integration

Impact of counterargument integration on paper citations.

Figure 1: Correlation between counterargument integration and citation frequency in academic papers (Based on 2023 meta-analysis data)

Counterargument Crafting Exercises

• Devil’s Advocate Dialogue: Engage in a written dialogue, alternating between your thesis and potential counterarguments.
• Counterargument Mapping: Create a visual map of your main argument, identifying potential points of contention and linking them to counterarguments.
• Reverse Outline: Outline your paper from an opponent’s perspective, highlighting areas they might challenge.
• Strength-Weakness-Opportunity-Threat (SWOT) Analysis: Apply this strategic planning technique to your argument, identifying internal strengths and weaknesses, and external opportunities and threats.
• Peer Review Counterargument Workshop: Exchange papers with colleagues, focusing specifically on generating potential counterarguments for each other’s work.

Mastering the art of crafting and integrating counterarguments is a cornerstone of rigorous academic writing. By anticipating and addressing potential objections, researchers not only strengthen their own arguments but also contribute to a more nuanced and comprehensive scholarly discourse. The strategies and exercises outlined here provide a foundation for developing this critical skill. Remember, the goal is not to “win” an argument, but to advance understanding in your field through thorough, balanced, and intellectually honest engagement with all perspectives.

• Fahnestock, J., & Secor, M. (2021). A Rhetoric of Argument (4th ed.). McGraw Hill. https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/rhetoric-argument-fahnestock-secor/M9781260248395.html
• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., Williams, J. M., Bizup, J., & FitzGerald, W. T. (2020). The Craft of Research (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo23521678.html
• Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2021). “They Say / I Say”: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (5th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. https://wwnorton.com/books/9780393538700

From Thesis to Antithesis: Crafting Counterarguments in Academic Writing -Few More Points

In academic writing, the ability to craft strong counterarguments is essential for developing a well-rounded and persuasive thesis. This guide will explore the process of moving from thesis to antithesis, providing strategies for identifying, developing, and integrating effective counterarguments into your academic papers.

Understanding Thesis and Antithesis

The main argument or claim of your paper, supported by evidence and reasoning.

A counterargument or opposing viewpoint that challenges your thesis.

The Importance of Counterarguments

• Demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the topic
• Strengthens your argument by addressing potential weaknesses
• Enhances credibility and objectivity
• Engages readers in critical thinking
• Fulfills academic expectations for balanced analysis

Steps to Craft Effective Counterarguments

1. identify potential counterarguments.

• Brainstorm opposing viewpoints
• Research alternative perspectives
• Consider limitations of your thesis

2. Evaluate and Select Counterarguments

• Choose the most relevant and strong opposing points
• Focus on arguments that directly challenge your thesis
• Consider the credibility of the counterargument sources

3. Develop Your Response

• Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the counterargument
• Gather evidence to refute or qualify the opposing view
• Formulate a logical and well-supported rebuttal

4. Integrate Counterarguments

• Place counterarguments strategically in your paper
• Use transitional phrases to introduce opposing views
• Maintain a respectful and objective tone

Strategies for Addressing Counterarguments

Directly challenge the validity of the counterargument by pointing out flaws in reasoning or providing contradictory evidence.

Acknowledge the merit of the counterargument but demonstrate why your thesis is still more convincing or applicable.

Qualification

Modify your thesis to accommodate valid points from the counterargument, strengthening your overall position.

Example: Thesis to Antithesis

Topic: impact of social media on society.

Thesis: Social media has positively transformed communication and information sharing, leading to increased global connectivity and democratization of information.

Antithesis: However, critics argue that social media has negatively impacted privacy, mental health, and the quality of interpersonal relationships.

Synthesis: While social media has undoubtedly revolutionized communication, it’s crucial to implement measures that mitigate its potential negative effects, such as stronger privacy protections and promoting digital well-being.

Straw Man Fallacy

Misrepresenting or oversimplifying the counterargument to make it easier to refute.

Confirmation Bias

Only considering counterarguments that are easy to refute, ignoring stronger opposing views.

Overemphasis

Giving too much weight to counterarguments, overshadowing your main thesis.

Dismissive Tone

Using language that belittles or disrespects opposing viewpoints, undermining your credibility.

Mastering the art of crafting counterarguments is essential for producing well-rounded and persuasive academic writing. By effectively moving from thesis to antithesis, you demonstrate critical thinking, engage with diverse perspectives, and ultimately strengthen your own arguments. Remember that the goal is not to “win” an argument, but to explore a topic thoroughly and contribute meaningfully to academic discourse.

Enhance Your Academic Writing

Start incorporating these strategies for crafting counterarguments in your next academic paper. Practice identifying and addressing opposing viewpoints to develop more nuanced and compelling arguments. Remember, embracing antithesis is a key step towards achieving a powerful synthesis in your writing.

Counterarguments are more than just quick thoughts or simple nods to other views. They are a key part of making a strong argument. By talking about and answering other views, we show we can think deeply, see challenges, and make a stronger case 1 . Making a counterargument has two main steps: 1 first, we state the opposing view clearly. Then, we use logic, evidence, and skill to argue against it.

Key Takeaways

• Counterarguments are key in academic writing, making your arguments more persuasive and showing your critical thinking.
• The process of making counterarguments means understanding the opposing view and then using logic and evidence to argue against it.
• Counterarguments can be added in the intro, a special paragraph, or as brief mentions throughout the essay.
• Using counterarguments makes your academic argument more convincing.
• Learning to make counterarguments can also improve your critical thinking and lead to deeper academic discussions.

Learning to craft counterarguments can make your academic writing better, show off your critical thinking skills , and lead to deeper discussions. Developing a Logical and Persuasive Argument for gives great tips and strategies for adding counterarguments to your work.

Understanding the Purpose of Counterarguments

When writing persuasive essays, it’s key to include counterarguments 2 . A strong thesis statement should have at least one valid counterargument 2 . Counterarguments show we’re open to different views on the topic.

Acknowledging Opposing Viewpoints

Respecting opposing views shows we’ve looked at all sides, not just our own 2 . There are two main types of thesis statements: closed and open ones 2 . Adding counterarguments makes our main argument stronger.

Strengthening Your Central Argument

Counterarguments can actually make our main point stronger 2 . They help shape our argument and thesis 2 . By tackling opposing views, we show our reasoning is solid and our claims are valid 2 .

Evidence is key to backing up our arguments 2 . It can be from research, experts, personal stories, or observations 2 . Warrants link evidence to our claims.

“The inclusion of counterarguments indicates fairness and balance in an argument and requires a response to each one.” 2

2 Counterarguments in academic writing have many roles 2 . They can disagree with the claim, question facts, or doubt assumptions 2 . By facing these points, we show we really get the topic and aim for a balanced view.

Crafting an Effective Counterargument

Crafting a strong counterargument is key for academic writers. It means respectfully presenting the opposing stance and then refuting it with logic and evidence . This strengthens your main argument and shows you can handle different views well 3 .

Respectfully Presenting the Opposing Stance

When you introduce a counterargument, be fair and objective. Don’t belittle the other side’s view. Instead, acknowledge the merits of the counterargument and show you understand their point. This makes your argument stronger 3 .

Refuting with Logic and Evidence

After showing the opposing view, it’s time to refute it with logical reasoning and evidence . Look at the counterargument’s weak points and take them down 3 . Use specific examples, data, or expert sources to back up your argument 4 . A strong, supported rebuttal can make your argument even stronger 3 .

The aim of a good counterargument isn’t to win debates. It’s to have a meaningful scholarly discussion. By respectfully presenting the opposing stance and refuting it with logic and evidence , you improve your writing and show you can think deeply and engage with various views 3 .

Placement of Counterarguments

When writing an academic argument, placing counterarguments is key. Introducing counterarguments early can make the thesis statement more thought-provoking 3 . This shows you know the other side of the argument, making your own argument stronger.

Introducing Counterarguments in the Introduction

Or, you can give a whole paragraph to counterarguments. This lets you dive deep into the opposing view and then show why it’s wrong 3 . It shows you really get the topic and can talk about it in a smart way 3 .

Another way is to mention other opinions briefly and then explain why they’re wrong 3 . This keeps the main argument clear while still showing you’ve thought about different views.

Counterargument Examples and Resources

To help you better understand and apply counterarguments in your writing, here’s a table of example resources with relevant examples:

Tip: Study these examples to understand how counterarguments are effectively integrated into different types of academic writing and activities. Practice applying these techniques in your own work.

Putting counterarguments in your essay makes it more persuasive and deep. By talking about the other side, you show you’re a critical thinker. You also prove you’re giving a balanced view of the topic.

Writing for school isn’t just about sharing your view and beating others. It’s about exploring different views to make strong, logical points. This helps grow a scholarly debate 5 . The goal is to light up, widen, and deepen a discussion, not to end it or solve a problem.

Creating counterarguments is key. By showing the other side and talking about it with respect, you make your main argument stronger. This shows you can think deeply and value all views 6 . It also makes your work more believable and shows off your critical thinking and balanced view.

• Identify and understand the opposing stance: Look closely at the arguments against your thesis. This helps you prepare for and answer counterarguments well.
• Refute with logic and evidence: Answer counterarguments with logical, fact-based arguments. Show why your view is stronger with solid evidence and logical thinking.
• Integrate counterarguments strategically: Put counterarguments in the right places in your writing, like the intro or body. This shows you value different views and makes your argument stronger.

Getting good at making counterarguments can make your school writing better. It helps you join in on important discussions in a big way. This guide on academic job interviews talks about critical thinking and presenting balanced views. These skills are useful in writing and in your career.

“The interest of a theory is inversely proportional to the probability of its thesis and directly proportional to the provability of its argument.” – Mikhail Epstein 6

By learning to make counterarguments, you can go deeper in your understanding, grow intellectually, and be seen as thoughtful, analytical, and valuable in the academic world 5 6 .

Enhancing Critical Thinking Through Counterarguments

Counterarguments are key in academic writing. They show we can think deeply by looking at different views on a topic 7 . By thinking about what others might say, we make our main argument stronger. We show we’ve looked at the topic from many sides 8 .

To make good counterarguments, we need to research and understand the other side well 7 . Then, we use evidence and logic to argue against them. This makes our writing more convincing and helps readers think harder about the topic.

Research shows that critical thinking means spotting problems, seeing connections, checking facts, and making smart conclusions 7 . By using counterarguments in our writing, we show these skills. We also make our readers think more deeply.

Adding counterarguments to our writing boosts our critical thinking. It makes our arguments stronger and more balanced 8 . By talking about other views, we make our story richer. This makes readers think more about the topic.

“Counterarguments are a valuable tool in various domains, including persuasive writing, debates and public speaking, legal arguments, political discourse, and critical thinking.” 8

Using counterarguments in our writing helps us think better and make stronger arguments. It makes our writing more interesting and leaves a mark on our readers.

Applying Counterargument Techniques

When you’re writing a strong academic argument, it’s key to share your thesis and think about counterarguments. By 4 understanding and answering opposing views, you make your main argument stronger. You also show off your critical thinking. Using counterargument techniques means you structure your argument well. This includes saying what others might say and why it’s wrong with logical arguments.

Acknowledging Opposing Arguments

To use counterarguments well, first 4 find and get what others might say against your idea. This means doing a lot of research and being open to different views. By saying you’ve thought about these other ideas, you show you’re well-rounded and open to debate.

Refuting with Logical Reasoning

After you know what others might say, the next step is to 4 argue against those ideas with logic and facts. Look at the other side’s arguments, see what’s good and bad about them, and then argue back. By 4 using logic to knock down the other views, you make your main argument stronger. You show why your idea is better.

Using counterarguments well makes your academic argument stronger. It shows you’ve thought about other views, argued against them, and proved your point. This way, you show you can think deeply and have meaningful discussions in your field.

“A well-crafted counterargument can make your argument more persuasive by anticipating and addressing potential objections.” – [https://editverse.com/clear-communication-avoiding-run-on-sentences-and-fragments/] 4

Remember, the secret to good counterarguments is to balance hearing other views and showing why they’re wrong. This makes your writing better and helps you think critically, which is key in school and beyond.

Rhetorical Devices for Rebuttal

When we write a strong counterargument, we need to use rhetorical devices carefully. These strategies, based on logos , pathos , and ethos , help us make our point clear and challenge other views 9 .

The logos appeal is about logic and reason. It helps us build solid arguments with logical steps 9 10 . But, we must watch out for mistakes like slippery slope or ad hominem attacks that can weaken our argument 10 .

The ethos appeal is about our trustworthiness and character. It tells us to use credible sources and respect other views 10 . Showing we are ethical makes our arguments more persuasive.

The pathos appeal connects with our audience’s feelings. It uses stories, images, and emotional words to support our logic 9 10 . But, we should be careful not to let emotions take over our argument.

By using these rhetorical devices wisely, we can make counterarguments that are both smart and touching. This makes our academic discussions stronger 9 10 .

Developing a Balanced Academic Argument

Creating a strong academic argument is key for convincing others and keeping readers interested 11 . Important tools include using rhetorical appeals and making sure your points are backed by evidence 11 . A good argument links ideas together well and doesn’t repeat itself too much 11 . Making your writing flow from simple to complex can make it easier for readers to follow 11 .

Considering Multiple Perspectives

Building a balanced argument means looking at different views on a topic 2 . In an argumentative essay, you should use sources that support your point and include a valid counterargument in your thesis 2 . Some theses are simple and use sub-claims, while others are complex and don’t need sub-claims 2 .

Counterarguments are crucial in academic writing. They help question assumptions, offer different views, and check if your argument is solid 2 . When dealing with counterarguments, you can agree with some points, reject bad arguments, or explain why they don’t weaken your main point 2 . You can put counterarguments at the start or end of your essay, but make sure to fully answer them 2 .

Dialectics is a method that presents an idea, looks at opposing views, and combines them to reach a conclusion 5 . It helps create a more complete discussion and can make your argument more convincing 5 . Knowing what your audience believes and might think is key to making a strong argument 5 .

“The dialectical process includes blending opposing ideas to form a synthesis, which provides a broader perspective on the topic.” 5

Identifying and Addressing Logical Fallacies

When making a strong counterargument, it’s key to avoid logical fallacies. Saying someone is “stupid” isn’t a good argument; it’s an ad hominem attack 12 . We need to look closely at the logic and evidence the other side uses.

Spotting and fixing logical mistakes makes our arguments stronger and more convincing. Learning about common logical errors helps us spot and correct bad reasoning.

• Errors like straw man , false cause , and hasty generalization weaken an argument.
• By using logic and evidence to tackle these mistakes, we boost our argument and show the flaws in the other side’s view.

Knowing how to spot and fix logical errors is key in academic writing 12 . With careful thought and evidence, we can have meaningful discussions and sway our audience.

“The function of argument is not to win, but to win over. It is not to prevail over the opposition, but to expand the consciousness of the audience.” – Aristotle

By being alert to logical mistakes and building our arguments with logic, we can have meaningful discussions and influence our audience 12 13 .

Scholarly Discourse and Counterarguments

In college, arguments aim to deepen our understanding, not just solve problems or end debates. Counterarguments are key in this process. They show our ability to think deeply about different views on a topic.

Writing counterarguments in school helps strengthen your main argument by looking at other sides of the issue 14 . By focusing on specific areas like clean tech, renewable energy, or planting trees, you can make your anti-pollution efforts clearer 14 . Talking about private cars in anti-pollution campaigns gets citizens involved and builds a sense of shared responsibility 14 .

Using phrases like “typically” or “usually” can make your claims more accurate by showing there are exceptions 14 . Knowing the debate, stating your stance early, and using different types of claims can make your arguments stronger 14 .

Many educators have reviewed this book, including Kevin Kennedy from Bridgewater State University and Julie Sorge Way from James Madison University, plus Li-Anne Delavega from Kapiolani Community College 15 . They gave ratings from 3 to 5, showing a mix of opinions on its quality 15 .

Reviewers praised the book for its focus on new students, its clear structure, and its easy-to-follow content 15 . They suggested adding more on writing skills, like how to structure paragraphs and avoid plagiarism 15 . The book is seen as a great start for first-year students, covering important topics like thesis writing and avoiding plagiarism 15 .

People liked how clear and easy to use the book is, thanks to its simple language and helpful structure 15 . But, some pointed out old references and the need for updates on tech topics 15 .

1 Barnet and Bedau (2005) say thinking critically gets better when you look at both sides of an argument 1 . Harvey (1999) has tools for handling counterarguments, showing it’s a key part of writing 1 . Westmoreland (2006; 2007) talks about new ways to replace animal tests in cosmetics, showing a move away from animal testing 1 .

Examples of using counterarguments cover topics like smoking on campus and testing on animals, showing its importance in today’s debates 1 .

Using counterarguments is key in writing strong academic papers. It means looking at other views and proving them wrong with facts and logic. Proper placement, use of rhetorical devices, and logical thinking are vital. They help make an argument stronger and more convincing 1 .

Barnet and Bedau (2005) say that thinking about both sides of an argument boosts critical thinking. This makes the main argument stronger 1 . Harvey (1999) adds that including a counterargument can make an essay more persuasive. It shows the writer has considered all sides of the issue 1 . Westmoreland (2006; 2007) talks about using human volunteers and skin made from cells for testing cosmetics. This is a way to answer counterarguments 1 .

Learning how to write strong counterarguments can improve academic writing. It shows critical thinking and a deep understanding of complex topics. This method makes the main argument more convincing. It also encourages thoughtful discussion and a balanced view on the topic.

What is a counterargument?

A counterargument is when you acknowledge views that differ from yours. Then, you explain why your view is the best choice. This involves presenting the opposing view and then showing why your argument is stronger.

How do I structure a counterargument?

To structure a counterargument, first acknowledge views that differ from yours. Then, refute those views using evidence. Use phrases like “although” or “however” to show why your argument is better.

Where can I place counterarguments in my essay?

You can place counterarguments in the intro to contrast with your thesis. Or, dedicate a paragraph to acknowledge and refute opposing views. You can also mention opposing views briefly and then explain why your view is correct.

How do counterarguments enhance critical thinking?

Counterarguments make an essay more persuasive by showing you’ve considered different sides. They improve critical thinking by making you think about both sides of an issue. This strengthens your argument.

How do I effectively use evidence in a counterargument?

Use evidence by introducing it clearly and explaining its importance. Don’t assume your evidence will speak for itself. Explain why each piece of evidence supports your argument.

What rhetorical devices can I use in a counterargument?

Use rhetorical devices like ethos, pathos, and logos to strengthen your argument. Review the concepts of rhetorical appeals before writing your argument. These tools can help you make your point more effectively.

How can I avoid logical fallacies when crafting a counterargument?

Avoid attacks on people instead of arguments. Learn about logical fallacies to ensure your argument is sound. Use evidence and reasoning to support your counterargument effectively.

What is the purpose of counterarguments in academic writing?

The goal of argument in college is to deepen a debate on a topic. Counterarguments show you can think critically about different views. They’re key to academic discussions, proving you can handle complex ideas.

Source Links

• https://www.unr.edu/writing-speaking-center/writing-speaking-resources/counterarguments
• https://pressbooks.library.tamu.edu/informedarguments/chapter/basic-structure-and-content-of-argument/
• https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/20-mar2014/32552334
• https://www.examples.com/business/29-counter-argument-examples-in-pdf.html
• https://opentextbc.ca/writingforsuccess/chapter/chapter-11-developing-a-convincing-argument/
• https://blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/writersteachingwriters/journal/above-all-make-it-interesting/
• https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1243509.pdf
• https://fourweekmba.com/counterargument/
• https://pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu/csu-fyw-rhetoric/chapter/rhetorical-strategies-building-compelling-arguments/
• https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/establishing_arguments/rhetorical_strategies.html
• https://viva.pressbooks.pub/comp2/chapter/understanding-argument/
• https://pvccenglish.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/chapter-10.pdf
• https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/ramage_argument/argument.pdf
• https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/establishing_arguments/index.html
• https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/284
• ← 日本人の脳梗塞急性期における血栓回収療法の最適化研究
• アジア人の慢性閉塞性肺疾患における遠隔モニタリングの有用性評価 →

Privacy Overview

Purdue Online Writing Lab College of Liberal Arts

Developing Strong Thesis Statements

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

The thesis statement or main claim must be debatable

An argumentative or persuasive piece of writing must begin with a debatable thesis or claim. In other words, the thesis must be something that people could reasonably have differing opinions on. If your thesis is something that is generally agreed upon or accepted as fact then there is no reason to try to persuade people.

Example of a non-debatable thesis statement:

This thesis statement is not debatable. First, the word pollution implies that something is bad or negative in some way. Furthermore, all studies agree that pollution is a problem; they simply disagree on the impact it will have or the scope of the problem. No one could reasonably argue that pollution is unambiguously good.

Example of a debatable thesis statement:

This is an example of a debatable thesis because reasonable people could disagree with it. Some people might think that this is how we should spend the nation's money. Others might feel that we should be spending more money on education. Still others could argue that corporations, not the government, should be paying to limit pollution.

Another example of a debatable thesis statement:

In this example there is also room for disagreement between rational individuals. Some citizens might think focusing on recycling programs rather than private automobiles is the most effective strategy.

The thesis needs to be narrow

Although the scope of your paper might seem overwhelming at the start, generally the narrower the thesis the more effective your argument will be. Your thesis or claim must be supported by evidence. The broader your claim is, the more evidence you will need to convince readers that your position is right.

Example of a thesis that is too broad:

There are several reasons this statement is too broad to argue. First, what is included in the category "drugs"? Is the author talking about illegal drug use, recreational drug use (which might include alcohol and cigarettes), or all uses of medication in general? Second, in what ways are drugs detrimental? Is drug use causing deaths (and is the author equating deaths from overdoses and deaths from drug related violence)? Is drug use changing the moral climate or causing the economy to decline? Finally, what does the author mean by "society"? Is the author referring only to America or to the global population? Does the author make any distinction between the effects on children and adults? There are just too many questions that the claim leaves open. The author could not cover all of the topics listed above, yet the generality of the claim leaves all of these possibilities open to debate.

Example of a narrow or focused thesis:

In this example the topic of drugs has been narrowed down to illegal drugs and the detriment has been narrowed down to gang violence. This is a much more manageable topic.

We could narrow each debatable thesis from the previous examples in the following way:

Narrowed debatable thesis 1:

This thesis narrows the scope of the argument by specifying not just the amount of money used but also how the money could actually help to control pollution.

Narrowed debatable thesis 2:

This thesis narrows the scope of the argument by specifying not just what the focus of a national anti-pollution campaign should be but also why this is the appropriate focus.

Qualifiers such as " typically ," " generally ," " usually ," or " on average " also help to limit the scope of your claim by allowing for the almost inevitable exception to the rule.

Types of claims

Claims typically fall into one of four categories. Thinking about how you want to approach your topic, or, in other words, what type of claim you want to make, is one way to focus your thesis on one particular aspect of your broader topic.

Claims of fact or definition: These claims argue about what the definition of something is or whether something is a settled fact. Example:

Claims of cause and effect: These claims argue that one person, thing, or event caused another thing or event to occur. Example:

Claims about value: These are claims made of what something is worth, whether we value it or not, how we would rate or categorize something. Example:

Claims about solutions or policies: These are claims that argue for or against a certain solution or policy approach to a problem. Example:

Which type of claim is right for your argument? Which type of thesis or claim you use for your argument will depend on your position and knowledge of the topic, your audience, and the context of your paper. You might want to think about where you imagine your audience to be on this topic and pinpoint where you think the biggest difference in viewpoints might be. Even if you start with one type of claim you probably will be using several within the paper. Regardless of the type of claim you choose to utilize it is key to identify the controversy or debate you are addressing and to define your position early on in the paper.

• Generating Ideas
• Drafting and Revision
• Sources and Evidence
• Style and Grammar
• Specific to Creative Arts
• Specific to Humanities
• Specific to Sciences
• Specific to Social Sciences
• CVs, Résumés and Cover Letters
• Graduate School Applications
• Other Resources
• Hiatt Career Center
• University Writing Center
• Classroom Materials
• Course and Assignment Design
• UWP Instructor Resources
• Writing Intensive Requirement
• Criteria and Learning Goals
• Course Application for Instructors
• What to Know about UWS
• Teaching Resources for WI
• FAQ for Instructors
• FAQ for Students
• Journals on Writing Research and Pedagogy
• University Writing Program
• Degree Programs
• Graduate Programs
• Brandeis Online
• Summer Programs
• Undergraduate Admissions
• Graduate Admissions
• Financial Aid
• Summer School
• Centers and Institutes
• Funding Resources
• Housing/Community Living
• Clubs and Organizations
• Community Service
• Brandeis Arts Engagement
• Rose Art Museum
• Our Jewish Roots
• Mission and Diversity Statements
• Administration
• Faculty & Staff
• Alumni & Friends
• Parents & Families
• Campus Calendar
• Directories
• New Students
• Shuttle Schedules
• Support at Brandeis

Writing Resources

Counterargument.

This handout is available for download in DOCX format and PDF format .

When you write an academic essay, you make an argument: you propose a thesis and offer evidence and reasoning to suggest why the thesis is true. When you counter-argue, you consider a possible argument against your thesis or some aspect of your logic. This is a good way to test your ideas early on, while you still have time to revise them. And in the finished essay, it can be a persuasive and disarming tactic. It allows you to anticipate doubts and pre-empt possible objections; it presents you as someone who weighs alternatives before arguing for one, who confronts difficulties instead of ignoring them, who is more interested in discovering the truth than winning a point.  

Not every objection is worth entertaining, of course, and you shouldn't include one just to include one. But some imagining of other views, or of resistance to one's own, occurs in most good essays. And instructors are glad to encounter counterargument in student papers, even if they haven't specifically asked for it.

The Turn Against

Counterargument in an essay has two stages: you turn against your argument to challenge it and then you turn back to re-affirm it. You first imagine a skeptical reader, or cite an actual source, who might resist your argument by pointing out:

• a problem with your demonstration, e.g., that a different conclusion could be drawn from the same facts, a key assumption is unwarranted, a key term is used unfairly, certain evidence is ignored or played down
• one or more disadvantages or practical drawbacks to what you propose
• an alternative explanation or proposal that makes more sense

You introduce this “turn against” with a phrase like One might object here that... or It might seem that... or It's true that... or Admittedly,... or Of course,... or with an anticipated challenging question: But how...? or But why...? or But isn't this just...? or But if this is so, what about...? Then you state the case against yourself as briefly but as clearly and forcefully as you can, pointing to evidence where possible. (An obviously feeble or perfunctory counterargument does more harm than good.)

The Turn Back

Your return to your own argument—which you announce with a but , yet , however , nevertheless or still —must likewise involve careful reasoning, not a flippant or nervous dismissal. In reasoning about the proposed counterargument, you may:

• refute it, showing why it is mistaken—an apparent but not real problem
• acknowledge its validity or plausibility, but suggest why on balance it's relatively less important or less likely than what you propose, and thus doesn't overturn it
• concede its force and complicate your idea accordingly; restate your thesis in a more exact, qualified, or nuanced way that takes account of the objection; or start a new section in which you consider your topic in light of it. (This will work if the counterargument concerns only an aspect of your argument; if it undermines your whole case, you need a new thesis.)

Where to Put a Counterargument

Counterargument can appear anywhere in the essay, but it most commonly appears:

• as part of your introduction—before you propose your thesis—where the existence of a different view is the motive for your essay, the reason it needs writing
• as a section or paragraph just after your introduction, in which you lay out the expected reaction or standard position before turning away to develop your own
• as a quick move within a paragraph, where you imagine a counterargument not to your main idea but to the sub-idea that the paragraph is arguing or is about to argue
• as a section or paragraph just before the conclusion of your essay, in which you imagine what someone might object to what you have argued

Watch that you don't overdo it! An occasional counterargument will sharpen and energize your essay, but too many will weaken it by obscuring your main idea or hinting that you're ambivalent.

Counterargument in Pre-Writing and Revising

Good thinking constantly questions itself, so having an inner debate during the drafting stage can help you settle on a case worth making. As you consider possible theses and begin to write your draft, ask yourself: how might an intelligent person plausibly disagree with you or see matters differently? When you can imagine an intelligent disagreement, you have an arguable idea.

Others can be of assistance here, too! If you ask people around you what they think of topic X and/or stay alert for uncongenial remarks in class discussions, etc., you'll encounter a useful disagreement somewhere. Awareness of this disagreement, however you use it in your essay, will force you to sharpen your own thinking as you write. If you come to find the counterargument more persuasive than your thesis, consider making it your thesis and turning your original thesis into a counterargument. And finally, if you manage to draft an essay without imagining a counterargument, make yourself imagine one before you revise and see if you can integrate it.

Adapted from Gordon Harvey, The Elements of the Academic Essay, 2009.

• Resources for Students
• Writing Intensive Instructor Resources
• Research and Pedagogy